Coat of arms used by Louis Philip III, Duke of Orleans during his tenure as "King of the French"
How can a monarchist support a branch that descends from the so called Philip Egalitte? may be the most hypocritye person that has ever existed, the betray of the Duke of Orleans can be compared to that of Judas against Our Lord Jesuschrist.
In the eve of the french revolution Louis Philip II, Duke of Orleans was the Premier Prince du Sang, a french prince with all the privileges and honours that the title carries, however he was always a very ambicious person that wanted to be the King of France at any cost.
It was 1789 and the revolution erupted in l'hexagone of France, soon came the most tragic year of all the Monarchical History: 1792, the year when His Most Christian Majesty Louis XVI of France was beheaded by the guillotine, everybody will be surpised knowing that Louis Philip II voted in favor of the regicide, even the revolutionaries were shocked by this.
The young son of Louis XVI, Louis Charles became for the royalist Louis XVII however the french revolutionary government decided to establish a republic and abolish the monarchy, Louis Philip II changed his name to Philippe Egalite and "rennounced" to his origins and alligned with the new government.
He had a special disgust for the queen Marie Antoinette and there are very deep suspicions that he even provoked the death of the Dowager Queen. At the end however everyone pays its own debts, and Louis Philip II was also killed by the revolutionary government during the Reign of Terror, I'm sure he's paying his sins at the hell lamenting his betray to his royal cousin the martyr king Louis XVI.
Ironically his son and succesor Louis Philip III succeeded to become "King of the French" as an usurper thus following the betray of his father, in 1830 when Charles X abdicated the throne should have passed to Louis XIX and after him to Henry V, however the General Estates "elected" the Duke of Orleans as the next monarch, this was of course illegal and without any historical or traditional basis.
Louis-Philippe III, Duke of Orleans, one of the biggest betrayers in French history.
As a prince du sang and cousin to the king, Louis Philip III should have rejected the offer of the throne, however he accepted and became "King of the French", BETRAY BETRAY and more BETRAY!, at the end he payed his betray when in 1848 a new French Revolution deposed his usurper government, the decaying prince then was exiled.
Today his male line descendants continue to claim the throne of France under false and illegal pretensions, they are not the most senior capetians, they are betrayeres of the legitime monarchy, they are standard bearers of a fratricide legacy, the only right pretender to the Throne of the Holy France is: HMCM Louis XX, Duke of Anjou, may God give him male issue!!
3 comentarios:
Henri VII, Comte de Paris is the rightful and ONLY King of France, no Spaniard need apply! Why even His Most Catholic Majesty of Spain acknowledges the Orleans Family as the only royal family of France; as do most French Monarchists.The crimes of Phillipe Egalite do not cancel the whole Orleans Family.France needs a real French Family on the throne; no Spanish foreigners.
"Henri VII" can only be King of France if about 80 other people die first, without producing legitimate male issue. Likewise, "King" Juan Carlos is only King of Spain because he was appointed to the role by the tyrannical dictator Franco!
The crimes of Phillipe Egalite do not remove the Orleans branch from the Line of Succession. Who knows one day they may indeed become the Legitimate branch, as did the Bourbon branch. However, right now they are a junior cadet branch.
Also, to say "no Spaniards" is foolish. Louis XX's mother is French. Likewise, all Royal Families have made marriages and children with other countries' people. Elizabeth II of Britain is German, her husband is Greek/Danish, but people say they are British! Henri of Orleans too has all types non-French blood.
Something puzzles me about those strange Orleanists. If they regard abdications, renunciations etc. as valid, then why do they call the "Comte De Paris" Henry VII?
That must mean that they recognise the Legitimist Henri V, but that would then negate their recognition of Louis-Philippe, the first Orleanist king.
Likewise, if they recognise Philippe of Anjou's renunciation, why do they then not also recognise Egalite's renunciation?
If they state that "no foreigners need apply", how can they then recognise Henri IV and ALL his descendants as being Kings of France?
And if abdication and renunciation is valid, if they can reconcile with the Revolutionaries, then surely "Henri VII" can only call himself that IF he is actually the de facto reigning King of France? Otherwise, he's just the Orleanist claimant?
Long live the ONLY Rightful King of France, HMCM Louis XX!
Publicar un comentario